Sunday, September 25, 2011

The Plan of Chicago: parks importance/movement

"Density of population beyond a certain point results in disorder, vice, and disease, and thereby becomes the greatest menace to the well-being of the city itself. Natural scenery, on the other hand, furnishes the contrasting element to the artificiality of the city, a refuge, where mind and body are restored to a normal condition, and we are enabled to take up the burden of life in our crowded streets and endless stretches of buildings with renewed vigor and hopefulness." pg101

In our last class we talked about The Plan of Chicago and the urban parks and playground movement. The question of whether parks are a necessity to urban life was put to the test. Some disagreed and believed that it is not so significant that its absence would create disorder or affect residents so drastically as mentioned in the above quote. However, I argued that I believe it is essential to have some sort of refuge whether it is artificial, man-made, or natural. Of course it is difficult to come to a consensus because we do possess these sites and are unaware of how living without them would truly change or affect our views.

So why do I agree with the above quote? As an environmental studies minor this topic has been a huge debate in my environmental courses. Parks, playgrounds, open fields, or any space that reminds us of a comfortable natural surrounding tends to have a positive affect on us. I believe that these places remind us of being somewhere else away from our worries, work, and the fast paced clock that we live by. I know we have all walked on the streets of downtown Chicago. Look back to a day when we took a tour as a class. Do you remember the crowded sidewalks, countless promoters trying to get your attention, the struggle to get to the other side of a street before the light changes, and people pushing beside you on foot, bikes, or skates? It's definitely a rush that you must be ready and understanding to. Now try to look back to those very few areas that were just an open space filled with people sitting, talking, reading, sleeping...relaxing. These place are not hidden, instead they are right in the middle of that fast paced commotion I just described. However, the mood is completely different. It is inviting, warm, and looks enjoyable. I tried to imagine the city without those few locations. If I only saw the tall metal, brick, or stone buildings surrounded with crowded streets and sidewalks that offer NO place for a breath from that rush I think my whole attitude towards the city would change. Everyone needs a place, that isn't their home, where they can take a break from the city life. Even if you never decide that you will use those parks or open spaces you at least have that option to take on that opportunity.  :)

2 comments:

  1. I whole heartendly agree with the points you are making Sheeba! If cities such as Chicago did not offer places that at least resembled nature, it is all too easy to get lost in the monotony of commmuting and the speed at which the city moves. Burnham was right in his emphasis on parks, not only to make the city beatiful and appealing to tourists (probably why the Merchants Club and sponsors did not appose these ideas) but to offer residents and commuters the chance to stop an relax. I don't know if you saw on our walking tour, but there was a group of 10-15 people taking part in a Tai-Chi class in Millenium Park, which I think offered a perfect example of how Burnham may have intended the parks to be used.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I couldn't agree more, Sheeba. Chicago would be completely unlivable were it not for the parks, the playgrounds, the forest preserve and, of course, the beaches and the lakeshore. If you want to see an example of what an industrial city looks like WITHOUT parks and playgrounds, take a look at some of the grimmer cities of Eastern Europe (like Ostrava, in the Czech Republic, which has a coal mining shaft rather than a park in the center of town). It is one of the things Burnham definitely got right.

    ReplyDelete